Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Jim Davis, Veterans-For-Change's column >>

JIM DAVIS, VETERANS-FOR-CHANGE

Home Page
Veterans Advocate
Articles Posted: 147  Links Seeded: 973
Member Since: 6/2009  Last Seen: 5/18/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Will Illegal Immigrants Benefit Under Healthcare Reform?

Wed May 19, 2010 3:08 PM EDT
health, health-care, iraq, diabetes, korea, malpractice, medical-care, agent-orange, appeals, pow, american-legion, desert-storm, enough-is-enough, dioxins, cold-war-veterans, dav, disable-veterans, medical-care-and-treatment, benefits-claims
By Jim Davis, Veterans-For-Change
Advertise | AdChoices

One of the most contentious aspects of the new healthcare legislation is whether illegal immigrants will get free or subsidized benefits at the expense of taxpayers. Chances are many will, particularly those who are working using stolen Social Security numbers.

The new health law excludes illegal immigrants from receiving premium subsidies, and they are banned from purchasing insurance with their own funds by the legislation. In order to do so, proof of citizenship or legal resident status is required. But therein lies the rub. Currently the government has no fail-proof system to provide citizenship or legal status verification.

The major tool that the government uses to check Social Security numbers and legal status of workers is called E-Verify. According to the research company that evaluated the system for the Department of Homeland Security, E-Verify fails to catch more than half the unauthorized workers it checks. It fails because the systems cannot detect identity fraud when an illegal works under the name and legitimate Social Security number of someone else.

The legislation specifies that, in cases where the documents provided by someone attesting to be a citizen of the United States don’t match up with those of the Social Security Administration or the Department of Homeland Security, Medicaid rules will apply. Under those rules individuals start on Medicaid, but if they are unable to resolve documentation problems such as the lack of valid citizenship papers, they are simply dis-enrolled after 90 days. States across the nation are struggling to cover the growing burdens of Medicaid driving up state and local taxes as well.

TSCL believes that more accurate means of verification and tough eligibility rules must be developed to protect taxpayers and seniors from document fraud, abuse, and erroneous payments that would provide healthcare for illegal immigrants.

Sources: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Subtitle F, Sec. 1501, March 24, 2010. “E-Verify Misses Half of Illegal Workers, Report Finds,” The Associated Press, February 25, 2010.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Jim Davis, Veterans-For-Change's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (4)
Jim Davis, Veterans-For-Change

Now aren't you happy we have healthcare?

  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Wed May 19, 2010 3:09 PM EDT
A Sergeant's Mom

"The new health law excludes illegal immigrants from receiving premium subsidies, and they are banned from purchasing insurance with their own funds by the legislation. In order to do so, proof of citizenship or legal resident status is required. But therein lies the rub. Currently the government has no fail-proof system to provide citizenship or legal status verification."

These are illegal immigrants. Illegal immigrants are acting outside of the law. Illegal immigrants are criminals. Why would we offer health care for free to someone blatantly breaking the law with absolutely no citizenship?

I do not understand your point.

As a legal US citizen of the United States, should I be putting these individuals before my own family with my tax dollars?

    Reply#2 - Wed May 19, 2010 4:59 PM EDT
    Robert Blevins - AB of Seattle

    Are you kidding? Enforcement is up. Since TANF was enacted and adopted by the states in 1996, the Brookings Institution says 50% less people are on welfare, although this year Food Stamp expeditures are up slightly due to the recession.

    Just try obtaining services as you say without proper ID these days. It's hard enough for legal citizens to get them. The law on health care reform is quite clear. Please stop fear-mongering.

    Robert...also a vet.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#3 - Thu May 20, 2010 5:22 AM EDT
    Jim Davis, Veterans-For-Change

    Evidently your state is entirely different...

    CA is bankrupt 75% due to taxpayers supporting illegal aliens!

    Immigration

    A bad night for incumbent Senators who have favored foreign workers over U.S. workers -- and hopeful signs of improved immigration balance in the U.S. Senate next year:

    Although immigration was not a pivotal issue in the campaigns, the election results suggest possibilities of real improvements in the immigration-issue balance in Congress. But voters need to push most of Tuesday's winners toward stronger immigration-reduction positions.

    • Pennsylvania Democrats in their Primary election put an end to the 30-year U.S. Senate tenure of Arlen Specter who had spent most of that career as a Republican championing the importation of foreign workers.
    • In Arkansas, a consistent supporter of amnesties to keep illegal foreign workers in U.S. jobs (Sen. Blanche Lincoln) failed to win the nomination in the Democratic Primary, forced into a runoff in June.
    • In the Arkansas Republican Primary for Senate, the winner (Rep. John Boozeman) is one of the best champions in the U.S. House in terms of protecting U.S. workers from unfair competition from high immigration.
    • Coincidentally, an extramarital affair led to the resignation Tuesday of the holder of one of the worst immigration records among U.S. House Republicans (Rep. Mark Souder). Only 5 Republicans in the House have worse career immigration-reduction grades.
    • This follows Utah's Republican convention defeat of incumbent Sen. Robert Bennett earlier (he had a record of leaning toward greedy business desires for foreign labor) . . .
    • Tuesday results also follow the earlier Democratic Primary defeat of West Virginia incumbent Rep. Allan Mullohan who for 38 years has earned a NumbersUSA "F-Grade" for his dozens of actions putting the interests of greedy employers and foreign workers over the needs of low-paid and unemployed U.S. workers.

    PENNSYLVANIA -- SEN. SPECTER HAD A LONG DESTRUCTIVE RECORD ON IMMIGRATION

    As a Republican in 1996, Sen Specter joined the rebellion of then-Sen. Spencer Abraham (R-Mich.) in blocking the Simpson/Smith bill to carry out the bi-partisan Jordan Commission recommendations for deep reductions in legal and illegal immigration.

    The result of Specter and his ideological colleagues' actions has been the addition of another 40 million to the labor force and population of the U.S. since then.

    Abraham's penchant for foreign workers cost him his seat in the 2000 election.

    But Specter has continued his destructive immigration actions for another decade, including much support for amnesties.

    Specter has been somewhat helpful on border security. But his overall career actions earned him a D+ on NumbersUSA's report cards.

    Unfortunately, the man who beat him Tuesday (Rep. Joe Sestak) also has a D+ career record. The difference is that Sestak has only been causing damage for three years, and his few bad actions do not yet indicate a deep commitment to foreign workers over U.S. workers. We were pleased to see that his website made no mention of support for immigration or amnesty. Democrats in Pennsylvania need to help him see the value of following immigration-restriction Democratic Senators like Byron Dorgan of North Dakota.

    The winner of the Pennsylvania Republican Primary (former Rep. Patrick Toomey) did not have that great of an immigration record during his 1999-2005 stint in the U.S House. He earned a "B-minus grade." Nonetheless, that would be a huge improvement over Specter's record. Plus, Toomey's grade would have been much higher if not for his votes for free trade agreements with Singapore and Chile that created virtually unlimited immigration channels from those small countries. State Republicans need to push Toomey to take more forceful immigration-reduction stances.

    KENTUCKY -- NOT CLEAR ENOUGH COMMITMENTS FROM SENATE PRIMARY WINNERS

    In the highly contested open-seat Primaries for the Kentucky Senate seat, the winners have not taken particularly clear stands on immigration. We need the state's voters to begin pressuring the winners in both Parties to show that they understand that immigration during these times is a profoundly jobs-related issue.

    Unless one of these nominees steps forward with commitments for immigration reductions, either candidate will mean a step backwards for U.S. workers because they would be replacing retiring Sen. Bunning (R-Kentucky) who has one of the best immigration-reduction grades in the Senate.

    ARKANSAS -- HUGE CHANGE POSSIBLE IN THE FALL

    On the issue of immigration in the upcoming fall general election for U.S. Senator, the Parties could not be further apart.

    Republicans have nominated for the Senate John Boozeman, one of the U.S. House's strongest opponents of illegal immigration and one of the strongest supporters of reducing overall authorized immigration numbers.

    Democratic Sen. Lincoln, however, has consistently backed all kinds of amnesties for illegal foreign workers and amnesties for the outlaw businesses that hire them during her time representing Arkansas in Washington. She failed to receive the necessary 50% to win the nomination Tuesday in a three-way Primary and will face the more liberal Lt. Gov. Bill Halter in a June runoff.

    Although Lincoln is considered one of the moderate Democrats in the Senate, there is nothing moderate about her D-minus overall "Recent" (2007-2010) Immigration-Reduction Grade. During these last two Congresses, she has only one semi-bright spot, a B Grade on border security actions.

    But Lincoln has earned a D on interior enforcement to keep illegal aliens from taking U.S. jobs, an F on Amnesties, and an F-minus on Chain Migration, an F-minus on importation of unnecessary workers for specific jobs, and an F-minus on granting rewards to illegal aliens.

    The other runoff Democratic candidate, Bill Halter has thus far given no sign that he would perform any better on immigration.

    The state's Republican voters, however, have offered up a Primary victor who would immediately become one of the Senate's biggest stalwarts for U.S. workers on immigration issues.

    Four of the eight candidates in the Republican Primary filled out the NumbersUSA survey and overwhelmingly agreed with NumbersUSA positions on what to do about immigration! One of them, U.S. Rep. John Boozeman was able to win his eight-person race outright with 53% of the vote, while Sen. Lincoln could not get to 50% in a three-way race.

    Boozeman's "Recent" Immigration-Reduction grade is an A+.

    Boozeman is a Member of NumbersUSA's elite "5 for 5 Club" in which he is co-sponsoring legislation to eliminate Chain Migration, to eliminate the Visa Lottery, to eliminate Birthright Citizenship for illegal aliens' babies, to mandate verification of all workers to preserve jobs for Americans, and to require the federal government to assist local governments in apprehending illegal aliens.

    Friends, in every state over the next six months you will have opportunities to change either the makeup of Congress or the positions of incumbents who get returned to Congress.

      #3.1 - Thu May 20, 2010 5:29 AM EDT
      Reply
      Leave a Comment:
      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
      You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
      (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
      Newsvine Privacy Statement
      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
      FUN STUFF:
      • Leaderboard |
      • E-Mail Alerts |
      • Top of the Vine |
      • Newsvine Live |
      • Newsvine Archives |
      • The Greenhouse |
      COMPANY STUFF:
      • Code of Honor |
      • Company Info |
      • Contact Us |
      • Jobs |
      • User Agreement |
      • Privacy Policy |
      • About our ads
      LEGAL STUFF:
      • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
      • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
      • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com